Chemistry

Experimental research on eradicating heavy metals from the municipal strong waste incineration fly ash with the modified electrokinetic remediation gadget


1.

Yildiz, Y. et al. Extremely Monodisperse Pt/Rh Nanoparticles Confined within the Graphene Oxide for Extremely Environment friendly and Reusable Sorbents for Methylene Blue Removing from Aqueous Options. Chemistryselect 2, 697–701, https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201601608 (2017).

2.

Sert, H. et al. Monodisperse Mw-Pt NPs@VC as Extremely Environment friendly and Reusable Adsorbents for Methylene Blue Removing. Journal Of Cluster Science 27, 1953–1962, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-Zero16-1054-Three (2016).

Three.

Sert, H. et al. Activated Carbon Furnished Monodisperse Pt Nanocomposites as a Superior Adsorbent for Methylene Blue Removing from Aqueous Options. J Nanosci Nanotechno 17, 4799–4804, https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2017.13776 (2017).

four.

Mouedhen, I., Coudert, L., Blais, J. F. & Mercier, G. Research of things concerned within the gravimetric separation course of to deal with soil contaminated by municipal strong waste. J Environ Handle 209, 23–36 (2018).

5.

Jafari, N. H., Stark, T. D. & Thalhamer, T. Spatial and temporal traits of elevated temperatures in municipal strong waste landfills. Waste Handle 74, 1–2 (2018).

6.

Weibel, G. et al. Extraction of heavy metals from MSWI fly ash utilizing hydrochloric acid and sodium chloride answer. Waste administration (New York, N.Y.) 76, 457–471, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.Zero22 (2018).

7.

Azimi, A., Azari, A., Rezakazemi, M. & Ansarpour, M. J. C. R. Removing of Heavy Metals from Industrial Wastewaters: A Evaluate. Chembioeng Evaluations four, 37–59 (2017).

eight.

Şen, F. et al. The dye removing from aqueous answer utilizing polymer composite movies. Utilized Water Science eight, 206, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-Zero856-x (2018).

9.

Abu-Zied, B. M., Hussein, M. A., Khan, A. & Asiri, A. M. Cu-Cu2O@graphene nanoplatelets nanocomposites: Facile synthesis, characterization, and electrical conductivity properties. Supplies Chemistry and Physics 213, 168–176, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.04.Zero36 (2018).

10.

Khan, A., Khan, A. A. P., Asiri, A. M. & Khan, I. Facial synthesis, characterization of graphene oxide-zirconium tungstate (GO-Zr(WO4)2) nanocomposite and its software as modified microsensor for dopamine. J. Alloy. Compd. 723, 811–819, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.221 (2017).

11.

Khan, A., Khan, A. A. P., Hussein, M. A., Neppolian, B. & Asiri, A. M. Preparation of recent and novel wave like poly(2-anisidine) zirconium tungstate nanocomposite: Thermal, electrical and ion-selective research. Chinese language Journal of Chemical Engineering 27, 459–466, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2018.03.Zero28 (2019).

12.

Khan, A. et al. Preparation and characterization of PANI@G/CWO nanocomposite for enhanced 2-nitrophenol sensing. Utilized Floor Science 433, 696–704, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.219 (2018).

13.

Khan, A. A. & Khan, A. Electrical conductivity and cation alternate kinetic research on poly-o-toluidine Th(IV) phosphate nano-composite cation alternate materials. Talanta 73, 850–856, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2007.05.Zero03 (2007).

14.

M.R, S. et al. A complete overview of methods for pure fibers as reinforcement in composites: Preparation, processing and characterization. Carbohydrate Polymers 207, 108–121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.083 (2019).

15.

Yazdani, M., Monavari, S. M., Omrani, G. A., Shariat, M. & Hosseini, S. M. A Comparative Analysis Of Municipal Strong Waste Landfill Websites In Northern Iran. Appl Ecol Env Res 15, 91–110 (2017).

16.

Inglezakis, V. J. et al. Present municipal strong waste administration within the cities of Astana and Almaty of Kazakhstan and analysis of other administration eventualities. Clear Technol Envir 20, 503–516 (2018).

17.

Ikhlayel, M. Growth of administration programs for sustainable municipal strong waste in growing international locations: a scientific life cycle pondering method. J Clear Prod 180, 571–586 (2018).

18.

Zheng, H. T., Kou, Ok. P. & Ge, Y. Environmental danger evaluation of the municipal strong waste in a city-state: A case research of Macao. Hum Ecol Threat Assess 23, 1796–1818 (2017).

19.

Rana, R., Ganguly, R. & Gupta, A. Physico-chemical characterization of municipal strong waste from Tricity area of Northern India: a case research. J Mater Cycles Waste 20, 678–689 (2018).

20.

Safar, Ok. M., Bux, M. R., Aslam, U. M., Shankar, B. A. & Goel, R. Ok. The feasibility of putrescible parts of municipal strong waste for biomethane manufacturing at Hyderabad, Pakistan. Waste Handle Res 36, 169–182 (2018).

21.

Panepinto, D. & Zanetti, M. C. Municipal strong waste incineration plant: A multi-step method to the analysis of an energy-recovery configuration. Waste Handle 73, 332–341 (2018).

22.

Negi, S., Dhar, H., Hussain, A. & Kumar, S. Biomethanation potential for co-digestion of municipal strong waste and rice straw: A batch research. Bioresource Technol 254, 139–144 (2018).

23.

Mu, Y., Saffarzadeh, A. & Shimaoka, T. Utilization of waste pure fishbone for heavy metallic stabilization in municipal strong waste incineration fly ash. J Clear Prod 172, 3111–3118 (2018).

24.

Zahedi, S., Garcia-Morales, J. L., Gross sales, D. & Solera, R. Bioenergy Technology from Municipal Strong Waste and Glycerin Waste: Inhabitants Dynamics. Energ Gas 31, 9550–9556 (2017).

25.

Meng, F. S., Xue, H., Wang, Y. Y., Zheng, B. H. & Wang, J. L. Citric-acid preacidification enhanced electrokinetic remediation for removing of chromium from chromium-residue-contaminated soil. Environ Technol 39, 356–362 (2018).

26.

Zhang, Y. W. et al. Research on electro-kinetic remediation of heavy metals in municipal strong waste incineration fly ash with a three-dimensional electrode. Rsc Adv 7, 27846–27852 (2017).

27.

Yuan, L. Z. et al. The affect of macroelements on power consumption throughout periodic energy electrokinetic remediation of heavy metals contaminated black soil. Electrochim Acta 235, 604–612, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.142 (2017).

28.

Boulakradeche, M. O., Akretche, D. E., Cameselle, C. & Hamidi, N. Enhanced Electrokinetic Remediation of Hydrophobic Organics Contaminated Soils by the Mixture of Non-Ionic and Ionic Surfactants. Electrochim Acta 174, 1057–1066, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.06.091 (2015).

29.

Masi, M., Iannelli, R. & Losito, G. Ligand-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of metal-contaminated marine sediments with excessive acid buffering capability. Environmental Science & Air pollution Analysis Worldwide 23, 10566–10576 (2015).

30.

Dong, Z. Y., Huang, W. H., Xing, D. F. & Zhang, H. F. Remediation of soil co-contaminated with petroleum and heavy metals by the combination of electrokinetics and biostimulation. J Hazard Mater 260, 399–408 (2013).

31.

Ramírez, E. M., Jiménez, C. S., Camacho, J. V., Rodrigo, M. A. R. & Cañizares, P. Feasibility Of Coupling Permeable Bio-Obstacles And Electrokinetics For The Remedy Of Diesel Hydrocarbons Polluted Soils. Electrochim Acta 181, 192–199 (2015).

32.

Seokoh, Ok., Schlautman, M. A. & Carraway, E. R. Cyclodextrin-enhanced electrokinetic removing of phenanthrene from a mannequin clay soil. Environ Sci Technol 34, 1535–1541, https://doi.org/10.1021/es990223t (2000).

33.

Suzuki, T., Kawai, Ok., Moribe, M. & Niinae, M. Restoration of Cr as Cr(III) from Cr(VI)-contaminated kaolinite clay by electrokinetics coupled with a permeable reactive barrier. J Hazard Mater 278, 297–303 (2014).

34.

Gao, J., Luo, Q., Zhang, C., Li, B. & Meng, L. Enhanced electrokinetic removing of cadmium from sludge utilizing a coupled catholyte circulation system with multilayer of anion alternate resin. Chem Eng J 234, 1–eight (2013).

35.

Zhang, Y. et al. Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of lead- and cadmium-contaminated paddy soil by composite electrolyte of sodium chloride and citric acid. J Soil Sediment 18, 1915–1924, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1890-2 (2018).

36.

Yan, Y. et al. Software of iron-loaded activated carbon electrodes for electrokinetic remediation of chromium-contaminated soil in a three-dimensional electrode system. Sci Rep-Uk eight, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24138-z (2018).

37.

Ni, M., Tian, S., Huang, Q. & Yang, Y. Electrokinetic-Fenton remediation of organochlorine pesticides from traditionally polluted soil. Environmental science and air pollution analysis worldwide 25, 12159–12168, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1479-Three (2018).

38.

Lopez Vizcaino, R. et al. Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of polluted soils by anolyte pH conditioning. Chemosphere 199, 477–485, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.038 (2018).

39.

Huang, T., Zhou, L., Liu, L. & Xia, M. Ultrasound-enhanced electrokinetic remediation for removing of Zn, Pb, Cu and Cd in municipal strong waste incineration fly ashes. Waste administration (New York, N.Y.) 75, 226–235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.029 (2018).

40.

Vocciante, M., Bagatin, R. & Ferro, S. Enhancements in Electrokinetic Remediation Expertise: Deal with water administration and wastewater restoration. Chem Eng J 309, 708–716 (2016).

41.

Tang, J., He, J. G., Xin, X. D., Hu, H. Z. & Liu, T. T. Biosurfactants enhanced heavy metals removing from sludge within the electrokinetic remedy. Chem Eng J 334, 2579–2592, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.Zero10 (2018).

42.

Acar, Y. B. et al. Electrokinetic remediation: Fundamentals and expertise standing. J Hazard Mater 40, 117–137 (1995).

43.

Villen-Guzman, M. et al. Scaling-up the acid-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of an actual contaminated soil. Electrochim Acta 181, 139–145 (2015).

44.

Villenguzman, M., Pazgarcia, J. M., Rodriguezmaroto, J. M., Gomezlahoz, C. & Garciaherruzo, F. Acid Enhanced Electrokinetic Remediation of a Contaminated Soil utilizing Fixed Present Density: Robust vs. Weak Acid. Separation Science & Expertise 49, 1461–1468 (2014).

45.

Cameselle, C. & Reddy, Ok. R. Growth and enhancement of electro-osmotic move for the removing of contaminants from soils. Electrochim Acta 86, 10–22 (2012).

46.

Masi, M., Iannelli, R. & Losito, G. Ligand-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of metal-contaminated marine sediments with excessive acid buffering capability. Environ Sci Pollut R 23, 10566–10576, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5563-7 (2016).

47.

Wada, S. & Umegaki, Y. Main ion and electrical potential distribution in soil underneath electrokinetic remediation. Environ Sci Technol 35, 2151 (2001).

48.

Zhu, S., Han, D., Zhou, M. & Liu, Y. Ammonia enhanced electrokinetics coupled with bamboo charcoal adsorption for remediation of fluorine-contaminated kaolin clay. Electrochim Acta 198, 241–248 (2016).


Supply hyperlink
asubhan

wordpress autoblog

amazon autoblog

affiliate autoblog

wordpress web site

web site improvement

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Close