Physics

Viewpoint: Immediately Measuring an Entangled State


David J. Starling, Division of Science, Pennsylvania State College, Hazleton, PA 18202, USA

October 9, 2019• Physics 12, 110

Researchers have straight measured the elements of a nonlocal, entangled wave perform, slightly than counting on oblique tomographic or reconstructive methods.

Figure captionexpand figure

Determine 1: Researchers have straight measured the wave perform of two entangled photons. The experiment generates photon pairs, which journey down 4 separate paths (proven in blue). The photons are entangled in such a approach that measuring which paths are taken can produce a set of “modular values,” which reveal the nonlocal polarization state of the photons.Researchers have straight measured the wave perform of two entangled photons. The experiment generates photon pairs, which journey down 4 separate paths (proven in blue). The photons are entangled in such a approach that measuring which paths are taken … Present extra

Figure caption

Determine 1: Researchers have straight measured the wave perform of two entangled photons. The experiment generates photon pairs, which journey down 4 separate paths (proven in blue). The photons are entangled in such a approach that measuring which paths are taken can produce a set of “modular values,” which reveal the nonlocal polarization state of the photons.×

Measuring the quantum state of a system is tough. The frequent approach, known as tomography, includes measuring a number of copies of the system and utilizing the statistics of that ensemble to algorithmically guess the closest potential quantum state [1]. A extra direct methodology exists utilizing so-called weak values, that are the results of weak (low-precision) measurements on a pre- and postselected quantum state [2–4]. Nevertheless, the weak worth strategy is restricted in relation to measuring nonlocal (spatially separated) quantum states. In a brand new work, the group of Guang-Can Guo on the College of Science and Expertise of China has proven that it’s potential to straight measure the wave perform of two spatially separated entangled photons [5]. Quite than weak values, the researchers make use of modular values, that are characterizations of a quantum system obtained by making a powerful measurement of a qubit, known as the meter, that’s coupled to the system [6]. This demonstration could result in extra environment friendly strategies for probing giant entangled techniques, as are imagined in future quantum data applied sciences.

To grasp the context of this new work, allow us to take into account the state of a single electron. We are able to take into consideration all of the potential measurements that may be made on the electron. For instance, we are able to measure its spin path alongside the z axis (up or down) or alongside the x axis. We are able to observe its place or its momentum in a sure path. Quantum principle restricts these measurements by limiting the precision of data obtainable for 2 complimentary observables, akin to place and momentum. Moreover, there may be the issue of measurement disturbance, the place a powerful measurement of 1 observable (place) irreversibly alters the results of one other observable (momentum). Nevertheless, as many have found, it’s potential to make weak measurements the place the disturbance is minimal. In these conditions, some restricted data can nonetheless be gained about complimentary observables with out violating the strict limits set by quantum principle [7]. For example, scientists can measure the spin of an electron by deflecting it with a magnetic discipline. If the magnetic discipline is weak sufficient, spin-up and spin-down electrons will solely be displaced by a small quantity from their imply trajectories. Such a weak measurement can go away the unique spin state of the electron intact.

To extract probably the most from a weak measurement, researchers have devised experiments the place they preselect and postselect which quantum states they have a look at. The output of such a measurement is named a weak worth [4]. The precise which means of the weak worth has been debated, with some researchers claiming that it provides a direct view of underlying quantum options and others suggesting that weak values can violate customary quantum limits. Nonetheless, it’s clear that the examine of weak values represents a bone fide advance in our understanding of quantum measurement, significantly within the direct measurement of wave features.

The primary direct measurement of a wave perform with weak values occurred in 2011 when Jeff Lundeen and collaborators on the Institute for Nationwide Measurement Requirements in Canada recovered the spatial wave perform of an ensemble of single photons [2]. Though their experimental approach was nonetheless statistical, in that many an identical copies of the photon have been measured in succession, their methodology bypassed the usual tomographic reconstruction to straight measure the advanced amplitudes of the photon’s quantum wave perform [1]. Lundeen’s group adopted these experiments with weak measurements of a two-state system—on this case, the 2 orthogonal polarization states of a photon [3] (see 12 September 2016 Viewpoint). That work confirmed that weak values can be utilized to straight measure the density matrix, which is a generalization of the wave perform that may account for statistically combined ensembles of pure states.

The following step on this improvement would presumably be to straight measure the wave perform of a two-state system, wherein the person states are entangled and spatially separated. Nevertheless, the usual weak worth scheme can’t be utilized to nonlocal states, because it requires data to instantaneously cross between the particles throughout the weak measurements [6]. Researchers have discovered a technique to acquire the weak values for nonlocal states [8], however the methodology requires a number of (low-probability) weak measurements. The knowledge obtained from such measurements may be very restricted, which suggests the experiments need to be repeated a lot of occasions and could be impractical for entangled photon experiments.

Guo’s staff overcame the difficulties with weak values by switching to modular values, which additionally contain pre- and postselection of quantum states however are based mostly on sturdy slightly than weak measurements. The staff first generated entangled photons utilizing an ultraviolet (UV) laser and a beta barium borate (BBO) crystal that transformed UV photons into lower-energy photon pairs. The photons may journey down certainly one of 4 separate paths. Due to momentum conservation and the properties of the BBO crystal, the 2 photons in every pair have been entangled in each their paths and of their polarization (Fig. 1). The staff used the trail state of the photons because the qubit meter with the intention to decide the polarization state of the entangled photons. Particularly, they postselected polarization states utilizing wave plates and polarizing beam splitters in every path, and so they used interference results and single-photon detectors to strongly measure the paths of the photons. By analyzing the info, they may calculate the entangled polarization state. The staff verified their outcomes utilizing customary tomographic methods.

The measurement and characterization of entangled states is extraordinarily essential for quantum data purposes akin to cryptography, communication, and computing. As state-of-the-art analysis efforts proceed to provide bigger entangled quantum techniques, strategies to characterize these techniques should equally enhance. Normal tomographic strategies grow to be tough as system sizes enhance, partially because of the requirement of worldwide reconstruction of the complete quantum state. Due to this fact, direct measurement strategies—that scale moderately—could present a great choice for entangled state characterization. I imagine the work by Guo’s group may present such an choice. It is going to be attention-grabbing to see if their modular worth methodology could be expanded to atomic or superconducting techniques, that are broadly being studied in quantum computing purposes.

This analysis is revealed in Bodily Overview Letters.

References

D. F. V. James, P. G. Kwiat, W. J. Munro, and A. G. White, “Measurement of qubits,” Phys. Rev. A 64, 052312 (2001).J. S. Lundeen, B. Sutherland, A. Patel, C. Stewart, and C. Bamber, “Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction,” Nature 474, 188 (2011).G.  S. Thekkadath, L. Giner, Y. Chalich, M.  J. Horton, J. Banker, and J.  S. Lundeen, “Direct measurement of the density matrix of a quantum system,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 120401 (2016).Y. Aharonov, D. Z. Albert, and L. Vaidman, “How the results of a measurement of a element of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can transform 100,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351 (1988).W.-W. Pan et al., “Direct measurement of a nonlocal entangled quantum state,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 150402 (2019).Y. Kedem and L. Vaidman, “Modular values and weak values of quantum observables,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 230401 (2010).M. Ozawa, “Universally legitimate reformulation of the Heisenberg uncertainty precept on noise and disturbance in measurement,” Phys. Rev. A 67, 042105 (2003).J. S. Lundeen and Ok. J. Resch, “Sensible measurement of joint weak values and their connection to the annihilation operator,” Phys. Lett. A 334, 337 (2005).

In regards to the Creator

Image of David J. Starling

David J. Starling is an Affiliate Professor of Physics at Pennsylvania State College’s Hazleton campus. He obtained his B.S. in physics and arithmetic on the State College of New York at Fredonia, and his M.A. and Ph.D. in physics on the College of Rochester. His analysis spans the areas of weak values, quantum data, quantum measurement, utilized optics, physics schooling, and photo voltaic power. His main focus is on the usage of novel imaging methods in low-signal environments.

Direct Measurement of a Nonlocal Entangled Quantum State

Wei-Wei Pan, Xiao-Ye Xu, Yaron Kedem, Qin-Qin Wang, Zhe Chen, Munsif Jan, Kai Solar, Jin-Shi Xu, Yong-Jian Han, Chuan-Feng Li, and Guang-Can Guo

Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 150402 (2019)

Revealed October 9, 2019

Learn PDF

Topic Areas

Associated Articles

Viewpoint: Quantum Correlations Take a New ShapeViewpoint: Surfing on a Wave of Quantum ChaosSynopsis: Playing a Quantum “Oldie” on a Turntable Extra Articles


Supply hyperlink

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Close